<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Bad Donkeys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crankyphoneguy.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/bad-bad-donkeys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crankyphoneguy.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/bad-bad-donkeys/</link>
	<description>It's the reception, stuipd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cranky Phone Guy</title>
		<link>http://crankyphoneguy.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/bad-bad-donkeys/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Cranky Phone Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyphoneguy.wordpress.com/?p=26#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Reception is usually one of Nokia&#039;s strengths, but for some reason the 6126 seems to vacillate on the signal more than other models.  In my own experience with the 6126 I found that it would pick up no signal at all in spots where a different phone, the W580, did just fine.  It did, however, perform well at reacquiring a lost signal in spots where the LG CU515 and 575 simply shrugged, crossed their legs, and scarfed a donut while giving me the finger. 

The network does make a difference.  I&#039;ve had very little trouble with AT&T; since they&#039;ve ejected most (if not all) of the legacy TDMA dead wood, it seems as though their signal strength has improved greatly in my elbow of the woods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reception is usually one of Nokia&#8217;s strengths, but for some reason the 6126 seems to vacillate on the signal more than other models.  In my own experience with the 6126 I found that it would pick up no signal at all in spots where a different phone, the W580, did just fine.  It did, however, perform well at reacquiring a lost signal in spots where the LG CU515 and 575 simply shrugged, crossed their legs, and scarfed a donut while giving me the finger. </p>
<p>The network does make a difference.  I&#8217;ve had very little trouble with AT&#038;T; since they&#8217;ve ejected most (if not all) of the legacy TDMA dead wood, it seems as though their signal strength has improved greatly in my elbow of the woods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollylisle</title>
		<link>http://crankyphoneguy.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/bad-bad-donkeys/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>hollylisle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyphoneguy.wordpress.com/?p=26#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Even though I can&#039;t say I got scathed, I definitely sympathize with your phone issues.

Until recently, I had a Nokia 6126 (on AT&amp;T&#039;s network--I&#039;m assuming the network will make a difference), which was in general a terrific phone.  Great tactile buttons, large bright screen, good sound through the earpiece and headset, a nice set of options like memory card, MP3 playing, and the like.  Decent enough interface--a few quirks, but nothing I couldn&#039;t live with. Battery life was only so-so, but that wouldn&#039;t have been a huge issue for me.

However, my phone suffered from less-than-stellar reception, and out where I live, what that meant was me walking around the house a lot of the time with no signal.

Is mediocre reception a big issue with Nokia&#039;s phones?  Or did I just pick the wrong one?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I can&#8217;t say I got scathed, I definitely sympathize with your phone issues.</p>
<p>Until recently, I had a Nokia 6126 (on AT&amp;T&#8217;s network&#8211;I&#8217;m assuming the network will make a difference), which was in general a terrific phone.  Great tactile buttons, large bright screen, good sound through the earpiece and headset, a nice set of options like memory card, MP3 playing, and the like.  Decent enough interface&#8211;a few quirks, but nothing I couldn&#8217;t live with. Battery life was only so-so, but that wouldn&#8217;t have been a huge issue for me.</p>
<p>However, my phone suffered from less-than-stellar reception, and out where I live, what that meant was me walking around the house a lot of the time with no signal.</p>
<p>Is mediocre reception a big issue with Nokia&#8217;s phones?  Or did I just pick the wrong one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
